![]() ![]() However, the increased speed of everything is inspiring, and encourages me to try new things and techniques. I hope so.ĭid the Mac Studio and Studio Display make me a better photographer? No, not at all. Apple has signaled that it will be improved in a firmware. Watching my FaceTime calls for some reason doesn't match the quality on my iPhone or iPad. The webcam is dreadful, as has been widely reported. If you have good speakers in your workspace don't use these built-in Apple speakers as an excuse to buy this monitor. Still, the Studio Display speakers sound good coming from such a thin display, certainly the best speakers built into a monitor I've heard. It appears to be about the same display that was in my 27" iMac. The built-in speakers are OK, but not quite as good as the pair of Audio Engine A 2+ mini-monitors I have on my desk. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles of newer monitors, like HDR and local dimming, but it looks fine. Actually doing the rendering is only about 15 seconds. Using my last Mac, getting a preview of the sharpen could take 30-45 seconds. The Topaz apps I use, Topaz Sharpen AI are screaming fast. I expect as the Luminar code gets tightened up it will be even faster. That's probably a combination of their universal code, more ram in this Mac versus my old one, and the speed of the processor. They are not as fast as my Adobe products, but render time appears to be about 10-15% improved. Luminar Neo and Luminar AI from Skylum are built for Apple Silicon and they are both faster than they were on my iMac. It's still running noticeably faster, and it can build a visual catalog on a networked volume faster than it used to. I do use, and like, Adobe Bridge, but it hasn't been upgraded to Apple Silicon yet. A 9 image panorama previewed in about 6 seconds (usually it took 20-30 seconds) and the actual assembly took around a minute. I use Lightroom mainly for assembling panoramas that's really fast too. I had the impression effects were applied in almost real-time. From a just booted Mac Photoshop came up in around 2 seconds. I uninstalled and re-installed it, and the Apple Silicon version came to life. Photoshop was a disappointment until I realized my Time Machine backup dutifully moved an Intel version of PS to the new Mac. It seems about 25% faster on the Mac Studio. My usual workflow is DXO PureRAW to Photoshop, a pass through Topaz Sharpen AI, and then onto other specialty editors like Luminar AI when needed,ĭXO PureRAW is not M1 native, but they've done a few tricks to speed things up. The Time Machine transfer took about 1 1/2 hours, which was quicker than I thought it should be.Īfter the usual, and multiple logins to iCloud, I was ready to edit some photos. The Studio was really fast on this important first trial. It was ready to go in a tad less than 5 seconds.) I wondered if the boot process would be longer when the Mac was fully loaded. (Parenthetically, I should say I have never seen a Mac boot up so quickly. When I plugged in the Mac Studio and the Studio Display the new Mac Studio did its usual routine with the machine asking me if I had a backup. I had already just sold my iMac, but had done 2 Time Machine backups of it before it departed. I didn't even notice that until I was moving the boxes to the garage. With typical Apple whimsy, the back of the boxes showed the back of the products. there was a pull tab and each box opened easily with no tools. As I hovered over the new arrivals with a box cutter, Apple had faked me out. The 2 boxes from Apple arrived on the 18th, the release day. It totaled $4,798 plus tax, but that included the Studio Display (more about that later). I upped the hard drive to 2 TB to match the iMac I was getting rid of. My choice was the Studio with 64 gigs of ram, I opted to spend the additional 200 bucks on a 10 core CPU system with a 32 core GPU, and a 16 core neural engine. ![]() Another motivator was that I hated that my laptop was faster than my desktop, and I really wanted to work on a bigger screen. I opted for very fast, as reviewers seemed to be saying the M1 Max was more than enough for a landscape photographer. It came in two versions, very fast, and very fast x 2. I had expected a 27" iMac, but instead, we got something much better: The Mac Studio. I kept wondering when a desktop M1 Mac would come along. Last year I bought the 16" model with the M1 Max chip, and loved it. Things got better with the release of laptops with the new Apple Silicon Mac Book pros. That was too much money for me, so I sat on the iMac hoping for better days. The next significant jump up was to the Mac Pro, originally the awful (in my view) trashcan Mac Pro, and when Apple thankfully ditched it they replaced it with another Intel-based Mac Pro (cheese grater) in 2019. The problem was Apple had a big hole in its lineup. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |